DISCUSSION "Means of Authorising Legal Acts in the Electronic Environment"
A signature is not the only way to confirm a legal act in the digital world. Experts agree that we need to clearly distinguish authentication (who I am) from authorization (what I agree to) and scale the level of assurance according to the risk of the specific service. They also talked about why "click-to-sign" did not solve usability and what mobile signatures, eIDAS 2 and the European identity wallet are set to bring. The Slovak context has been shaped by the European regulation of electronic signatures and subsequent national laws, which put the qualified electronic signature on a par with a handwritten one. The intention was clear: to ensure integrity, authenticity, non-repudiation, and proof of the time of the act, even though each act requires these assurances to a different degree. "Click-to-sign" emerged as a response to the inconvenience of readers and cards, but its legislative framing leveled different authorization methods to a single tier. The result was uncertainty: the same "paper" weight for tools with unequal security and a weak willingness of authorities to go below the level of QES.From guaranteed signature to "click-to-sign"