Ultrasound therapy: the robot as a patient hand

Based on consultations with therapists in Levice, they summarized the key requirements: constant contact of the applicator head with the skin, perpendicular guidance, selectable procedure time, and a smooth circular motion. The result was an intuitive on‑screen control with simple buttons; the therapist merely taught the robot a few points by hand, and the system automatically generated the required trajectory. Safety was a priority—if the patient unexpectedly moves the limb or bumps into the robot, the robot backs off and, after confirmation by the therapist, continues where it left off.

They also introduced transparent records of where the robot moved and what forces it applied. This helps assess therapy quality and prevent misunderstandings about the intensity of the procedure. In this way, the team shifted a repetitive, physically demanding task to the machine, while the therapist remains the decisive authority in choosing the procedure. The advantages are consistency, traceability, and less staff fatigue.

Bedside rehabilitation: fewer straps, more comfort

For lower‑limb rehabilitation, the team decided not to strap patients into bulky machines with cuffs and straps, but to bring the robot to the bed. The procedure is simple: measure the limb, put on the cuff, set the target flexion angle—per prescription, for example around 45 degrees—and let the robot patiently work toward it. The robot alternates pressing with releasing, monitors forces and torques, and in case of any discomfort a panic button is available; intervention and responsibility always lie with a professional therapist. The goal is not to take work away from people, but to ease heavy repetitive tasks; the team also signals future solutions for upper limbs and massage applications.