Dávid Zubko
He is an independent expert in the field of data protection. During his term at the Office for Personal Data Protection, as the Head of the International Relations Division and Coordinator of the SK PRES, he worked on the GDPR and personally represented Slovak Republic in negotiations in the EU Council. He also led a GDPR working party on the national level. He continued in his work on the GDPR as a data protection expert at the Ministry of Justice. He currently works in the private sector.
Sign in to Spring ITAPA 2024
-
GDPR consistency mechanism - how to prepare it | Medzinárodný kongres ITAPA 2017: Technology & HumanITy
The Consistency Mechanism represents a pillar, around which the whole new uniform European data protection system is built around. However, none or very little attention is paid to this key element of the GDPR. What is Consistency Mechanism, how does it work, how will it impact Slovak businesses and how can you prepare for it? -
GDPR consistency mechanism - how to prepare it | Medzinárodný kongres ITAPA 2017: Technology & HumanITy
The Consistency Mechanism represents a pillar, around which the whole new uniform European data protection system is built around. However, none or very little attention is paid to this key element of the GDPR. What is Consistency Mechanism, how does it work, how will it impact Slovak businesses and how can you prepare for it? -
Development of the personal data protection at the European level | Medzinárodný kongres ITAPA 2014: Future is TODAY
Why would you not miss the presentation?
Are you aware that the issue of personal data protection is currently under a substantial change? In what manner will this affect the rights and obligations of the subjects in this area?
Annotation
Come to see the presentation on prepared General Data Protection Regulation that should be a response to the growing development in the field of internet and technology and that should unify the legal provisions of personal data protection at the European level as well. The proposed legislation has an ambition to bring a higher level of protection for individuals together with a lower administrative burden for controllers. Will there be found a reasonable compromise?
